Skip to content

Simon Reed Interview at Resonance Films (2037) Event

Simon Reed’s interview at Resonance Films took place in 2037, after the release of ‘’I Am Still Me’‘. Julian Reyes and Kayla Rossi interviewed Simon Reed for a role helping manage production equipment as the company’s field workload grew.

Background and Context

Resonance Films had a small regular field crew. Cost had limited hiring, and an earlier field worker with big-budget experience had treated that experience as a reason to override Julian’s equipment and setup decisions. Julian had avoided another field hire for a long time. After the documentary brought more requests and projects, Kayla suggested adding a third core team member. Julian’s health and the workload made equipment preparation harder to manage alongside filming; handing off that work could leave him more energy for the camera.

Simon had worked in Hollywood for approximately fifteen years and wanted to join a smaller company. His experience included camera and lighting work, which he particularly enjoyed. Before the interview, Julian asked his uncle Jack Alvarez, a Mercedes-Benz technician, how to judge whether someone would respect another person’s equipment. Jack suggested asking Simon how he handled another person’s tools.

Interview

Kayla interviewed Simon alongside Julian and asked about the practical demands of the position. Simon discussed his theater training, his interest in filming and lighting, and his desire to work with a smaller crew. Julian’s questions focused on what Simon would do if he disagreed with a director’s setup or noticed a potential problem with equipment or footage.

Simon distinguished an immediate safety problem from a setup he merely would have chosen differently. He said he would intervene if equipment was about to fall and would privately tell Julian if he thought the setup risked unusable footage. He would not change Julian’s gear without asking or treat a creative choice as an error merely because he preferred another approach. He also wanted to know who had authority to make equipment decisions when the director was absent.

Asked about mistakes, Simon acknowledged that he had once changed another person’s camera settings without permission because he thought they were wrong. The settings had been intentional. Simon apologized, helped restore them, and changed his practice afterward. Julian valued the specific admission and the change in behavior; he had not expected an applicant to claim he had never made a mistake.

Immediate Outcome

The interview gave Julian a concrete account of how Simon handled another person’s equipment and professional authority. Simon’s answer addressed the concern that had kept Julian from making another field hire. Julian invited him to examine his camera, then asked whether Simon was available to start the following week. Simon said he could start Monday. As Julian grew tired, Kayla took over the discussion of the role’s practical terms and let him rest briefly while the interview continued.

Events Professional Events 2037 Events Los Angeles